Every SAP appeal, committee-ready by 9 a.m.
NineSweep runs your progress standards overnight — read-only — pulls each student's GPA, pace, and timeframe, checks the appeal packet for the statement and academic plan your policy requires, and hands the committee a table it can work from. The decision stays with the committee.
Not ready to share access? Send your SAP policy — no student records — and see the playbook it would run.
We do the legwork. You make the call.
Assign the queue at close. Read verdicts with your coffee.
You hand over the stack
Term-end evaluation for the whole population, or just the appeals waiting on Thursday's committee.
It reads every packet against your standard
Signs in read-only, pulls GPA, pace, and attempted credits, opens each appeal statement and academic plan, and measures them against the standard your policy actually sets.
Verdicts, with receipts
Committee-ready, missing a document, or human review — each row citing the transcript, the statement, and the plan behind it.
9:00 AMYour counselors make the determinations.
Trust is the product.
Read-only by design
Nothing in your student system changes. NineSweep never packages, never disburses, never releases a hold. It gathers and judges; anything outgoing — a missing-document notice, a decision letter — is drafted for your counselor's signature, never sent.
Verdicts a reviewer can follow
No chatbot prose. Every recommendation is a row in a table, and every row cites the ISIR transaction and field, the document page, and the screen it was read from — the same trail a program review would ask you for.
Your policy, not ours
Your verification tolerance, your appeal standard, what your office counts as conflicting information. Say it once in plain English: NineSweep revises its playbook, re-decides the affected files, and versions the change.
Good. Teach it yours — in a sentence.
Your tolerances, your carve-outs, your definition of “worth a second look” — typed as feedback, kept forever, applied to every run after, and versioned so you can show an auditor when the rule changed. No tickets, no retraining projects. Watch:
| Student | GPA / pace | Appeal packet | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| T. Nguyen · UGstatement + advisor plan | 1.72 / 58% | Complete | Committee-ready |
| S. Patel · UGdeath in family documented · no plan | 1.94 / 71% | Missing plan | Notice drafted |
| D. Reyes · GR3rd appeal · 2 prior approvals | 2.10 / 66% | Complete | Human review |
See it on your SAP policy first — no student data
Send your published SAP standard and your appeal form. You'll get back the playbook NineSweep would run against them, worked on synthetic appeal packets. No system access, no student records, no FERPA paperwork.
“NineSweep grew out of production agent automation inside a large public university's student-services operation — the same read-every-screen, judge-by-the-policy work an aid office does every packaging cycle. I build it, I run your pilot personally, and every verdict shows its work. If it can't earn your trust on your own files, it shouldn't have it.”
Apoorv Agarwal · Founder, NineSweep · Phoenix, AZ